4.6 Article

Identification of Loss of Function Mutations in Human Genes Encoding RIG-I and MDA5 IMPLICATIONS FOR RESISTANCE TO TYPE I DIABETES

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 284, 期 20, 页码 13348-13354

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M809449200

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  2. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  3. Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical Pharmaceutical Research
  4. Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20112009] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) and melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) are essential for detecting viral RNA and triggering antiviral responses, including production of type I interferon. We analyzed the phenotype of non-synonymous mutants of human RIG-I and MDA5 reported in databases by functional complementation in cell cultures. Of seven missense mutations of RIG-I, S183I, which occurs within the second caspase recruitment domain repeat, inactivated this domain and conferred a dominant inhibitory function. Of 10 mutants of MDA5, two exhibited loss of function. A nonsense mutation, E627*, resulted in deletion of the C-terminal region and double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) binding activity. Another loss of function mutation, I923V, which occurs within the C-terminal domain, did not affect dsRNA binding activity, suggesting a novel and essential role for this residue in the signaling. Remarkably, these mutations are implicated in resistance to type I diabetes. However, the A946T mutation of MDA5, which has been implicated in type I diabetes by previous genetic analyses, affected neither dsRNA binding nor IFN gene activation. These results provide new insights into the structure-function relationship of RIG-I-like receptors as well as into human RIG-I-like receptor polymorphisms, antiviral innate immunity, and autoimmune diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据