4.6 Article

Roscovitine Binds to Novel L-channel (Ca(V)1.2) Sites That Separately Affect Activation and Inactivation

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 285, 期 1, 页码 43-53

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.076448

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL074143]
  2. American Heart Association Predoctoral Fellowship [0715336U]
  3. Department of Anesthesiology at the Penn State College of Medicine
  4. Pennsylvania Department of Health using Tobacco Settlement Funds
  5. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL074143] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

L-type (Ca(V)1.2) calcium channel antagonists play an important role in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. (R)-Roscovitine, a trisubstituted purine, has been shown to inhibit L-currents by slowing activation and enhancing inactivation. This study utilized molecular and pharmacological approaches to determine whether these effects result from (R)-roscovitine binding to a single site. Using the S enantiomer, we find that (S)-roscovitine enhances inactivation without affecting activation, which suggests multiple sites. This was further supported in studies using chimeric channels comprised of N- and L-channel domains. Those chimeras containing L-channel domains I and IV showed (R)- roscovitine-induced slowed activation like that of wild type L-channels, whereas chimeric channels containing L-channel domain I responded to (R)-roscovitine with enhanced inactivation. We conclude that (R)-roscovitine binds to distinct sites on L-type channels to slow activation and enhance inactivation. These sites appear to be unique from other calcium channel antagonist sites that reside within domains III and IV and are thus novel sites that could be exploited for future drug development. Trisubstituted purines could become a new class of drugs for the treatment of diseases related to hyperfunction of L-type channels, such as Torsades de Pointes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据