4.6 Article

Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid Reactivates HIV from Latently Infected Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 284, 期 11, 页码 6782-6789

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M807898200

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI49104, AI058708, R01 AI40312, AI47062, DPI OD00329]
  2. University of California, San Francisco
  3. Center for AIDS Research Grants [P30 AI027763, P30 MH59037, CC99-SF-001]
  4. Clinical and Translational Research Institute [UL1 RR024131]
  5. National Institutes of Health Roadmap for Medical Research
  6. California Foundation for AIDS Research
  7. University-wide AIDS Research Program [F05-GI-219]
  8. Burroughs Wellcome Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) persists in a latent form in infected individuals treated effectively with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). In part, these latent proviruses account for the rebound in viral replication observed after treatment interruption. A major therapeutic challenge is to purge this reservoir. In this study, we demonstrate that suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) reactivates HIV from latency in chronically infected cell lines and primary cells. Indeed, P-TEFb, a critical transcription cofactor for HIV, is released and then recruited to the viral promoter upon stimulation with SAHA. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway is involved in the initiation of these events. Using flow cytometry-based single cell analysis of protein phosphorylation, we demonstrate that SAHA activates this pathway in several subpopulations of T cells, including memory T cells that are the major viral reservoir in peripheral blood. Importantly, SAHA activates HIV replication in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from individuals treated effectively with HAART. Thus SAHA, which is a Food and Drug Administration-approved drug, might be considered to accelerate the decay of the latent reservoir in HAART-treated infected humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据