4.6 Article

How Escherichia coli Is Equipped to Oxidize Hydrogen under Different Redox Conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 285, 期 6, 页码 3928-3938

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.067751

关键词

-

资金

  1. United Kingdom Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [P15018, BB/H001190/1, BB/D52222X, BB/H003878/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  3. Centre for Advanced Electron Spin Resonance [EP/D0448559/1]
  4. Royal Society
  5. Merton College, Oxford
  6. BBSRC [BB/H001190/1, BB/H003878/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. EPSRC [EP/D047943/1, EP/D048559/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. MRC [G117/519] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D52222X/1, BB/H001190/1, BB/H003878/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/D048559/1, EP/D047943/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Medical Research Council [G117/519] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The enterobacterium Escherichia coli synthesizes two H-2 uptake enzymes, Hyd-1 and Hyd-2. We show using precise electrochemical kinetic measurements that the properties of Hyd-1 and Hyd-2 contrast strikingly, and may be individually optimized to function under distinct environmental conditions. Hyd-2 is well suited for fast and efficient catalysis in more reducing environments, to the extent that in vitro it behaves as a bidirectional hydrogenase. In contrast, Hyd-1 is active for H-2 oxidation under more oxidizing conditions and cannot function in reverse. Importantly, Hyd-1 is O-2 tolerant and can oxidize H-2 in the presence of air, whereas Hyd-2 is ineffective for H-2 oxidation under aerobic conditions. The results have direct relevance for physiological roles of Hyd-1 and Hyd-2, which are expressed in different phases of growth. The properties that we report suggest distinct technological applications of these contrasting enzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据