4.3 Article

Reference Intervals of Serum Procalcitonin Are Affected by Postnatal Age in Very Low Birth Weight Infants during the First 60 Days after Birth

期刊

NEONATOLOGY
卷 108, 期 1, 页码 60-64

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000381330

关键词

Gestational age; Postnatal age; Premature infants; Procalcitonin; Reference intervals

资金

  1. Soonchunhyang University Research Fund [20150000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Procalcitonin (PCT) may be a more sensitive marker for neonatal bacterial infections than C-reactive protein (CRP). However, the reference intervals of serum PCT were not sufficiently studied in neonates older than 1 week of age, especially for very low birth weight infants. Objectives: This study investigated the reference level of serum PCT for neonates according to gestational age (GA) and postnatal age (PNA). Methods: Serum PCT was measured in 914 blood samples from 7-60 days after birth in 415 neonates including 184 premature infants. Infants with sepsis, congenital anomaly, or clinically evident intra-amniotic infections were excluded. Multivariate analysis of covariance was used to detect the interaction between GA and PNA. To compare subgroups dichotomized by GA and PNA, analysis of covariance was performed with clinical parameters as covariates to obtain an adjusted p value. Results: Serum PCT levels were negatively correlated with GA, PNA, birth weight, birth height, and platelet count, and positively correlated with white blood cell count, absolute neutrophil count, hematocrit, and serum CRP after logarithmic transformation. Reference intervals of serum PCT were established according to GA and PNA. High PCT levels were found in infants with GA <= 32 weeks and PNA 7-30 days. Conclusion: The reference levels of serum PCT were determined according to GA and PNA. As the reference PCT levels of infants with GA <= 32 weeks were affected by PNA, cautious interpretation of PCT levels in these infants is warranted. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据