4.6 Article

Wnt-5a-CKIα Signaling Promotes β-Catenin/E-Cadherin Complex Formation and Intercellular Adhesion in Human Breast Epithelial Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 284, 期 16, 页码 10968-10979

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M804923200

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Cancer Foundation
  2. Universitetssjukhuset-Malmo Allmanna Sjukhus Research Foundations
  3. Universitetssjukhuset Malmo r Allmanna Sjukhus Cancer Foundation
  4. Gunnar Nilsson's Cancer Foundation
  5. Crafoord Foundation
  6. Royal Physiographic Society in Lund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wnt-5a is a non-transforming Wnt protein that is implicated in cell polarity, adhesion, and motility. We have previously shown that low expression of Wnt-5a is a predictor of shorter disease-free survival in human breast cancer. Here, we investigated whether beta-catenin/E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion was affected by loss of Wnt-5a in breast carcinomas, thereby promoting a metastatic behavior of the tumor. We show that Wnt-5a stimulation of human breast epithelial cells leads to an increased Ca2+-dependent cell-cell adhesion. Furthermore, Wnt-5a/casein kinase I alpha (CKI alpha)-specific Ser-45 phosphorylation of beta-catenin is associated with an increased complex formation of beta-catenin/E-cadherin. Mutation of Ser-45 decreases the beta-catenin/E-cadherin association. Also, the inhibitory effect of Wnt-5a on breast epithelial cell invasion is reduced upon mutation of beta-catenin-Ser-45. The Wnt-5a-CKI alpha-induced Ser-45 phosphorylation does not lead to degradation of beta-catenin. Finally we show that human breast cancers lacking Wnt-5a protein have a significantly lower level of membrane-associated beta-catenin. Down-regulation of Wnt-5a expression and subsequent reduction of membrane-associated beta-catenin in invasive breast cancer, can therefore contribute to a decreased cell-cell adhesion and increased motility resulting in a higher probability for metastatic disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据