4.6 Article

Insulin Receptor Dysfunction Impairs Cellular Clearance of Neurotoxic Oligomeric Aβ

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 284, 期 28, 页码 18742-18753

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.011015

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [RO1-AG022547]
  2. NIA
  3. Intramural funding at Blanchette Rockefeller Neurosciences Institute, Rockville, MD
  4. American Health Assistance Foundation
  5. Alzheimer's Association
  6. Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., South

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accumulation of amyloid beta (A beta) oligomers in the brain is toxic to synapses and may play an important role in memory loss in Alzheimer disease. However, how these toxins are built up in the brain is not understood. In this study we investigate whether impairments of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptors play a role in aggregation of A beta. Using primary neuronal culture and immortal cell line models, we show that expression of normal insulin or IGF-1 receptors confers cells with abilities to reduce exogenously applied A beta oligomers (also known as ADDLs) to monomers. In contrast, transfection of malfunctioning human insulin receptor mutants, identified originally from patient with insulin resistance syndrome, or inhibition of insulin and IGF-1 receptors via pharmacological reagents increases ADDL levels by exacerbating their aggregation. In healthy cells, activation of insulin and IGF-1 receptor reduces the extracellular ADDLs applied to cells via seemingly the insulin-degrading enzyme activity. Although insulin triggers ADDL internalization, IGF-1 appears to keep ADDLs on the cell surface. Nevertheless, both insulin and IGF-1 reduce ADDL binding, protect synapses from ADDL synaptotoxic effects, and prevent the ADDL-induced surface insulin receptor loss. Our results suggest that dysfunctions of brain insulin and IGF-1 receptors contribute to A beta aggregation and subsequent synaptic loss.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据