4.6 Article

Copper-dependent Recycling of hCTR1, the Human High Affinity Copper Transporter

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 284, 期 43, 页码 29704-29713

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.000166

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [PO1 GM 067166]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Copper is an essential co-factor in many important physiological processes, but at elevated levels it is toxic to cells. Thus at both the organism and cellular level mechanisms have evolved to finely tune copper homeostasis. The protein responsible for copper entry from the circulation in most human cells is hCTR1, a small protein (190 amino acid residues) that functions as a trimer in the plasma membrane. In the present work we employ cell surface biotinylation and isotopic copper uptake studies of overexpressed hCTR1 in HEK293 cells to examine the acute (minutes) response of hCTR1 to changes in extracellular copper. We show that within 10 min of exposure to copper at 2.5 mu M or higher, plasma membrane hCTR1 levels are reduced (by similar to 40%), with a concomitant reduction in copper uptake rates. We are unable to detect any degradation of internalized hCTR1 in the presence of cycloheximide after up to 2 h of exposure to 0-100 mu M copper. Using a reversible biotinylation assay, we quantified internalized hCTR1, which increased upon the addition of copper and corresponded to the hCTR1 lost from the surface. In addition, when extracellular copper is then removed, internalized hCTR1 is promptly (within 30 min) recycled to the plasma membrane. We have shown that in the absence of added extracellular copper, there is a small but detectable amount of internalized hCTR1 that is increased in the presence of copper. Similar studies on endogenous hCTR1 show a cell-specific response to elevated extracellular copper. Copper-dependent internalization and recycling of hCTR1 provides an acute and reversible mechanism for the regulation of cellular copper entry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据