4.6 Article

Commitment of 1-Methyl-4-phenylpyrinidinium Ion-induced Neuronal Cell Death by Proteasome-mediated Degradation of p35 Cyclin-dependent Kinase 5 Activator

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 284, 期 38, 页码 26029-26039

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.026443

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dysfunction of proteasomes and mitochondria has been implicated in the pathogenesis of Parkinson disease. However, the mechanism by which this dysfunction causes neuronal cell death is unknown. We studied the role of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5)-p35 in the neuronal cell death induced by 1-methyl-4-phenylpyrinidinium ion (MPP+), which has been used as an in vitro model of Parkinson disease. When cultured neurons were treated with 100 mu M MPP+, p35 was degraded by proteasomes at 3 h, much earlier than the neurons underwent cell death at 12-24 h. The degradation of p35 was accompanied by the down-regulation of Cdk5 activity. We looked for the primary target of MPP+ that triggered the proteasome-mediated degradation of p35. MPP+ treatment for 3 h induced the fragmentation of the mitochondria, reduced complex I activity of the respiratory chain without affecting ATP levels, and impaired the mitochondrial import system. The dysfunction of the mitochondrial import system is suggested to up-regulate proteasome activity, leading to the ubiquitin-independent degradation of p35. The overexpression of p35 attenuated MPP+-induced neuronal cell death. In contrast, depletion of p35 with short hairpin RNA not only induced cell death but also sensitized to MPP+ treatment. These results indicate that a brief MPP+ treatment triggers the delayed neuronal cell death by the down-regulation of Cdk5 activity via mitochondrial dysfunction-induced up-regulation of proteasome activity. We propose a role for Cdk5-p35 as a survival factor in countering MPP+-induced neuronal cell death.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据