4.6 Article

Clathrin Regulates the Association of PIPKIγ661 with the AP-2 Adaptor β2 Appendage

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 284, 期 20, 页码 13924-13939

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M901017200

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 DK53249, T32 DK061296, R01 CA104708]
  2. American Heart Association Established Investigator Award [0540007N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The AP-2 clathrin adaptor differs fundamentally from the related AP-1, AP-3, and AP-4 sorting complexes because membrane deposition does not depend directly on an Arf family GTPase. Instead phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P-2) appears to act as the principal compartmental cue for AP-2 placement at the plasma membrane as well as for the docking of numerous other important clathrin coat components at the nascent bud site. This PtdIns(4,5)P-2 dependence makes type I phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinases (PIPKIs) lynchpin enzymes in the assembly of clathrin-coated structures at the cell surface. PIPKI gamma is the chief 5-kinase at nerve terminals, and here we show that the 26-amino acid, alternatively spliced C terminus of PIPKI gamma 661 is an intrinsically unstructured polypeptide that binds directly to the sandwich subdomain of the AP-2 beta 2 subunit appendage. An aromatic side chain-based, extended interaction motif that also includes the two bulky C-terminal residues of the short PIPKI gamma 635 variant is necessary for beta 2 appendage engagement. The clathrin heavy chain accesses the same contact surface on the AP-2 beta 2 appendage, but because of additional clathrin binding sites located within the unstructured hinge segment of the beta 2 subunit, clathrin binds the beta 2 chain with a higher apparent affinity than PIPKI gamma 661. A clathrin-regulated interaction with AP-2 could allow PIPKI gamma 661 to be strategically positioned for regional PtdIns(4,5)P-2 generation during clathrin-coated vesicle assembly at the synapse.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据