4.6 Article

A Polarity Probe for Monitoring Light-induced Structural Changes at the Entrance of the Chromophore Pocket in a Bacterial Phytochrome

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 284, 期 38, 页码 26005-26016

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.049056

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [BO 1911/1-2, Sfb 498 TP B2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Light-induced structural changes at the entrance of the chromophore pocket of Agp1 phytochrome were investigated by using a thiol-reactive fluorescein derivative that is covalently attached to the genuine chromophore binding site (Cys-20) and serves as a polarity probe. In the apoprotein, the absorption spectrum of bound fluorescein is red-shifted with respect to that of the free label suggesting that the probe enters the hydrophobic chromophore pocket. Assembly of this construct with the chromophores phycocyanobilin or biliverdin is associated with a blue-shift of the fluorescein absorption band indicating the displacement of the probe out of the pocket. The probe does not affect the photochromic and kinetic properties of the noncovalent bilin adducts. Upon photoconversion to P-fr, the probe spectrum undergoes again a bathochromic shift and a strong rise in CD indicating a more hydrophobic and asymmetric environment. We propose that the environmental changes of the probe reflect conformational changes at the entrance of the chromophore pocket and are indicative for rearrangements of the chromophore ring A. Flash photolysis measurements showed that the absorption changes of the probe are kinetically coupled to the formation of Meta-R-C and P-fr. In the biliverdin adduct, an additional component occurs that probably reflects a transition between two Meta-R-C substates. Analogous results to that of the noncovalent phycocyanobilin adduct were obtained with the mutant V249C in which probe and chromophore are covalently attached. The conformational changes of the chromophore are correlated to proton transfer to the protein surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据