4.6 Article

Molecular Basis for Bcl-2 Homology 3 Domain Recognition in the Bcl-2 Protein Family IDENTIFICATION OF CONSERVED HOT SPOT INTERACTIONS

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 284, 期 26, 页码 17499-17511

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M805542200

关键词

-

资金

  1. Universite de Strasbourg
  2. CNRS
  3. INSERM
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proteins of the Bcl-2 family are important regulators of apoptosis, or programmed cell death. These proteins regulate this fundamental biological process via the formation of heterodimers involving both pro- and anti-apoptotic family members. Disruption of the balance between anti- and pro- apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins is the cause of numerous pathologies. Bcl-xl, an anti- apoptotic protein of this family, is known to form heterodimers with multiple pro- apoptotic proteins, such as Bad, Bim, Bak, and Bid. To elucidate the molecular basis of this recognition process, we used molecular dynamics simulations coupled with the Molecular Mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area approach to identify the amino acids that make significant energetic contributions to the binding free energy of four complexes formed between Bcl-xl and pro- apoptotic Bcl-2 homology 3 peptides. A fifth protein-peptide complex composed of another anti- apoptotic protein, Bcl-w, in complex with the peptide from Bim was also studied. The results identified amino acids of both the anti- apoptotic proteins as well as the Bcl-2 homology 3 (BH3) domains of the pro- apoptotic proteins that make strong, recurrent interactions in the protein complexes. The calculations show that the two anti- apoptotic proteins, Bcl-xl and Bcl-w, share a similar recognition mechanism. Our results provide insight into the molecular basis for the promiscuous nature of this molecular recognition process by members of the Bcl-2 protein family. These amino acids could be targeted in the design of new mimetics that serve as scaffolds for dew antitumoral molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据