4.6 Article

Differential Clathrin Binding and Subcellular Localization of OCRL1 Splice Isoforms

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 284, 期 15, 页码 9965-9973

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M807442200

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council Senior Nonclinical Research Fellowship [G117/494]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Project [34/C17842]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [C17842] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [G117/494] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. MRC [G117/494] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutation of the inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase OCRL1 causes the X-linked disorder oculocerebrorenal syndrome of Lowe, characterized by defects in the brain, kidneys, and eyes. OCRL1 exists as two splice isoforms that differ by a single exon encoding 8 amino acids. The longer protein, termed isoform a, is the only form in brain, whereas both isoforms are present in all other tissues. The significance of OCRL1 splicing is currently unclear. Given its proximity to a clathrin-binding site, we hypothesized that splicing may alter the clathrin binding properties of OCRL1. Here we show that this is indeed the case. OCRL1 isoform a binds clathrin with higher affinity than isoform b and is significantly more enriched in clathrin-coated trafficking intermediates. We also identify a second clathrin-binding site in OCRL1 that contributes to clathrin binding of both isoforms. Association of OCRL1 with clathrin-coated intermediates requires membrane association through interaction with Rab GTPases but not binding to the clathrin adaptor AP2. Expression of OCRL1 isoform a lacking the 5-phosphatase domain impairs transferrin endocytosis, whereas an equivalent version of isoform b does not. Our results suggest that OCRL1 exists as two functional pools, one participating in clathrin-mediated trafficking events such as endocytosis and another that is much less or not involved in this process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据