4.6 Article

Wild type α-synuclein is degraded by chaperone-mediated autophagy and macroautophagy in neuronal cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 283, 期 35, 页码 23542-23556

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M801992200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R21 NS 055693] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

alpha-Synuclein ( ASYN) is crucial in Parkinson disease ( PD) pathogenesis. Increased levels of wild type ( WT) ASYN expression are sufficient to cause PD in humans. The manner of posttranscriptional regulation of ASYN levels is controversial. Previously, we had shown that WT ASYN can be degraded by chaperone- mediated autophagy ( CMA) in isolated liver lysosomes. Whether this occurs in a cellular and, in particular, in a neuronal cell context is unclear. Using a mutantASYNform that lacks the CMA recognition motif and RNA interference against the rate- limiting step in the CMA pathway, Lamp2a, we show here that CMA is indeed involved in WT ASYN degradation in PC12 and SH- SY5Y cells, and in primary cortical and midbrain neurons. However, the extent of involvement varies between cell types, potentially because of differences in compensatory mechanisms. CMA inhibition leads to an accumulation of soluble high molecular weight and detergent- insoluble species of ASYN, suggesting that CMA dysfunction may play a role in the generation of such aberrant species in PD. ASYN and Lamp2a are developmentally regulated in parallel in cortical neuron cultures and in vivo in the central nervous system, and they physically interact as indicated by co- immunoprecipitation. In contrast to previous reports, inhibition of macroautophagy, but not the proteasome, also leads toWTASYN accumulation, suggesting that this lysosomal pathway is also involved in normal ASYN turnover. These results indicate thatCMAand macroautophagy are important pathways for WT ASYN degradation in neurons and underline the importance of CMA as degradation machinery in the nervous system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据