4.6 Article

AMP-activated protein kinase and p38 MAPK activate O-GlcNAcylation of neuronal proteins during glucose deprivation

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 283, 期 19, 页码 13009-13020

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M801222200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA042486, R01 CA042486-25, CA42486] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [R37 HD013563, R01 HD13563, R37 HD013563-30] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK061671] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have demonstrated previously that a wide array of stress signals induces O-GlcNAc transferase ( OGT) expression and increases O-GlcNAcylation of many intracellular proteins, a response that is critical for cell survival. Here, we describe a mechanism by which glucose deprivation induces OGT expression and activity in Neuro-2a neuroblastoma cells. Glucose deprivation increases OGT mRNA and protein expression in an AMP-activated protein kinase-dependent manner, whereas OGT enzymatic activity is regulated in a p38 MAPK-dependent manner. OGT is not phosphorylated by p38, but rather it interacts directly with p38 through its C terminus; this interaction increases with p38 activation during glucose deprivation. Surprisingly, the catalytic activity of OGT, as measured toward peptide substrates, is not altered by glucose deprivation. Instead, p38 regulates OGT activity within the cell by recruiting it to specific targets, including neurofilament H. Neurofilament H is O-GlcNAcylated during glucose deprivation in a p38-dependent manner. Interestingly, neurofilament H solubility is increased by glucose deprivation in an O-GlcNAc-dependent manner, suggesting that O-GlcNAcylation of neurofilament H regulates its disassembly from filaments. Not only do these data help to reveal how OGT is regulated by stress, but these findings also describe a possible mechanism by which defective brain glucose metabolism, as found in aging and ischemia, may directly affect axonal structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据