4.6 Article

Characterization of Ser338 Phosphorylation for Raf-1 Activation

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 283, 期 46, 页码 31429-31437

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M802855200

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM057959, CA118918]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Raf kinases are essential for regulating cell proliferation, survival, and tumorigenesis. However, the mechanisms by which Raf is activated are still incompletely understood. Phosphorylation plays a critical role in Raf activation in response to mitogens. The present study characterizes phosphorylation of Ser(338), a crucial event for Raf-1 activation. Here we report that mutation of Lys(375) to Met diminishes phosphorylation of Ser(338) on both wild type Raf-1 in cells treated with epidermal growth factor (EGF) or 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) and a constitutively active mutant in which Tyr(340)/Tyr(341) are replaced by 2 aspartic acids, a conserved substitution present in natural B-Raf. The loss of Ser(338) phosphorylation in these Raf mutants is not engendered by a mutation-induced conformational change, inasmuch as mutation of another site (Ser(471) to Ala) in the activation segment also abolishes Ser(338) phosphorylation, whereas both the kinase-dead mutants of Raf-1 are phosphorylated well by active Pak1. Furthermore, our data demonstrate that EGF-stimulated phosphorylation of Ser(338) is inhibited by Sorafenib, a Raf kinase inhibitor, but not by the MEK inhibitor U0126. Interestingly, a kinase-dead mutation and Sorafenib also markedly reduce phosphorylation of Ser(445) on B-Raf, a site equivalent to Raf-1 Ser(338). Finally, our data reveal that Ser(338) is phosphorylated on inactive Raf-1 by an active mutant of Raf-1 when they are dimerized in cells and that artificial dimerization of Raf-1 causes Ser(338) phosphorylation, accompanied by activation of ERK1/2. Altogether, our data suggest that Ser(338) on Raf-1 is autophosphorylated in response to mitogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据