4.6 Article

Enzymological analysis of mutant protein kinase Cγ causing spinocerebellar ataxia type 14 and dysfunction in Ca2+ homeostasis

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 283, 期 28, 页码 19854-19863

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M801492200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spinocerebellar ataxia type 14 (SCA14) is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease caused by mutations in protein kinase C gamma(PKC gamma). Interestingly, 18 of 22 mutations are concentrated in the C1 domain, which binds diacylglycerol and is necessary for translocation and regulation of PKC gamma kinase activity. To determine the effect of these mutations on PKC gamma function and the pathology of SCA14, we investigated the enzymological properties of the mutant PKC gamma s. We found that wild-type PKC gamma, but not C1 domain mutants, inhibits Ca2+ influx in response to muscarinic receptor stimulation. The sustained Ca2+ influx induced by muscarinic receptor ligation caused prolonged membrane localization of mutant PKC gamma. Pharmacological experiments showed that canonical transient receptor potential (TRPC) channels are responsible for the Ca2+ influx regulated by PKC gamma. Although in vitro kinase assays revealed that most C1 domain mutants are constitutively active, they could not phosphorylate TRPC3 channels in vivo. Single molecule observation by the total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy revealed that the membrane residence time of mutant PKC gamma s was significantly shorter than that of the wild-type. This fact indicated that, although membrane association of the C1 domain mutants was apparently prolonged, these mutants have a reduced ability to bind diacylglycerol and be retained on the plasma membrane. As a result, they fail to phosphorylate TRPC channels, resulting in sustained Ca2+ entry. Such an alteration in Ca2+ homeostasis and Ca2+-mediated signaling in Purkinje cells may contribute to the neurodegeneration characteristic of SCA14.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据