4.5 Article

Probing Gαi1 protein activation at single-amino acid resolution

期刊

NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 22, 期 9, 页码 686-U64

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.3070

关键词

-

资金

  1. Roche [RPF113]
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds
  3. Paul Scherrer Institute
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [141898, 133810 31-135754, 31-153145, 31003A-146520]
  5. Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) Structural Biology
  6. NCCR Molecular Systems Engineering
  7. European Cooperation in Science and Technology [CM1207]
  8. Marie Curie Initial Training Network NanoMem
  9. Medical Research Council [MC_U105185859]
  10. Lister Institute Research
  11. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_146520] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  12. MRC [MC_U105185859] Funding Source: UKRI
  13. Medical Research Council [MC_U105185859, 1274107] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present comprehensive maps at single-amino acid resolution of the residues stabilizing the human G alpha(i1) subunit in nucleotide- and receptor-bound states. We generated these maps by measuring the effects of alanine mutations on the stability of G alpha(i1) and the rhodopsin-G alpha(i1) complex. We identified stabilization clusters in the GTPase and helical domains responsible for structural integrity and the conformational changes associated with activation. In activation cluster I, helices alpha 1 and alpha 5 pack against strands beta 1-beta 3 to stabilize the nucleotide-bound states. In the receptor-bound state, these interactions are replaced by interactions between alpha 5 and strands beta 4-beta 6. Key residues in this cluster are Y320, which is crucial for the stabilization of the receptor-bound state, and F336, which stabilizes nucleotide-bound states. Destabilization of helix alpha 1, caused by rearrangement of this activation cluster, leads to the weakening of the interdomain interface and release of GDP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据