4.6 Article

Differential Roles of Blocking Ions in KirBac1.1 Tetramer Stability

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 284, 期 5, 页码 2854-2860

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M807474200

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK069424, DK069424-02S1, HL54171]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Potassium channels are tetrameric proteins that mediate K+-selective transmembrane diffusion. For KcsA, tetramer stability depends on interactions between permeant ions and the channel pore. We have examined the role of pore blockers on the tetramer stability of KirBac1.1. In 150 mM KCl, purified KirBac1.1 protein migrates as a monomer (similar to 40 kDa) on SDS-PAGE. Addition of Ba2+ (K-1/2 similar to 50 mu M) prior to loading results in an additional tetramer band (similar to 160 kDa). Mutation A109C, at a residue located near the expected Ba2+-binding site, decreased tetramer stabilization by Ba2+ (K-1/2 similar to 300 mu M), whereas I131C, located nearby, stabilized tetramers in the absence of Ba2+. Neither mutation affected Ba2+ block of channel activity (using Rb-86(+) flux assay). In contrast to Ba2+, Mg2+ had no effect on tetramer stability (even though Mg2+ was a potent blocker). Many studies have shown Cd2+ block of K+ channels as a result of cysteine substitution of cavity-lining M2 (S6) residues, with the implicit interpretation that coordination of a single ion by cysteine side chains along the central axis effectively blocks the pore. We examined blocking and tetramer-stabilizing effects of Cd2+ on KirBac1.1 with cysteine substitutions in M2. Cd2+ block potency followed an alpha-helical pattern consistent with the crystal structure. Significantly, Cd2+ strongly stabilized tetramers of I138C, located in the center of the inner cavity. This stabilization was additive with the effect of Ba2+, consistent with both ions simultaneously occupying the channel: Ba2+ at the selectivity filter entrance and Cd2+ coordinated by I138C side chains in the inner cavity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据