4.6 Article

The Pore Domain Outer Helix Contributes to Both Activation and Inactivation of the hERG K+ Channel

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 284, 期 2, 页码 1000-1008

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M806400200

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [459002]
  2. Australian Research Council [DP0450808]
  3. Australian Research Council [DP0450808] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ion flow in many voltage-gated K+ channels (VGK), including the (human ether-a-go-go-related gene) hERG channel, is regulated by reversible collapse of the selectivity filter. hERG channels, however, exhibit low sequence homology to other VGKs, particularly in the outer pore helix (S5) domain, and we hypothesize that this contributes to the unique activation and inactivation kinetics in hERG K+ channels that are so important for cardiac electrical activity. The S5 domain in hERG identified by NMR spectroscopy closely corresponded to the segment predicted by bioinformatics analysis of 676 members of the VGK superfamily. Mutations to approximately every third residue, from Phe(551) to Trp(563), affected steady state activation, whereas mutations to approximately every third residue on an adjacent face and spanning the entire S5 segment perturbed inactivation, suggesting that the whole span of S5 experiences a rearrangement associated with inactivation. We refined a homology model of the hERG pore domain using constraints from the mutagenesis data with residues affecting inactivation pointing in toward S6. In this model the three residues with maximum impact on activation (W563A, F559A, and F551A) face out toward the voltage sensor. In addition, the residues that when mutated to alanine, or from alanine to valine, that did not express (Ala(561), His(562), Ala(565), Trp(568), and Ile(571)), all point toward the pore helix and contribute to close hydrophobic packing in this region of the channel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据