4.2 Article

Loss of Tsc1 accelerates malignant gliomagenesis when combined with oncogenic signals

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 155, 期 4, 页码 227-233

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jb/mvt112

关键词

gliomagenesis; mTORC1; neural stem; progenitor cells; TSC1

资金

  1. Project for Development of Innovative Research on Cancer Therapeutics (P-DIRECT) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  2. [25130705]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24790967, 25861263, 25118710] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastomas frequently harbour genetic lesions that stimulate the activity of mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1). Loss of heterozygosity of tuberous sclerosis complex 1 (TSC1) or TSC2, which together form a critical negative regulator of mTORC1, is also seen in glioblastoma; however, it is not known how loss of the TSC complex affects the development of malignant gliomas. Here we investigated the role of Tsc1 in gliomagenesis in mice. Tsc1 deficiency up-regulated mTORC1 activity and suppressed the proliferation of neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) in a serial neurosphere-forming assay, suggesting that Tsc1-deficient NSPCs have defective self-renewal activity. The neurosphere-forming capacity of Tsc1-deficient NSPCs was restored by p16(Ink4a)p19(Arf) deficiency. Combined Tsc1 and p16(Ink4a)p19(Arf) deficiency in NSPCs did not cause gliomagenesis in vivo. However, in a glioma model driven by an active mutant of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), EGFRvIII, loss of Tsc1 resulted in an earlier onset of glioma development. The mTORC1 hyperactivation by Tsc1 deletion accelerated malignant phenotypes, including increased tumour mass and enhanced microvascular formation, leading to intracranial haemorrhage. These data demonstrate that, although mTORC1 hyperactivation itself may not be sufficient for gliomagenesis, it is a potent modifier of glioma development when combined with oncogenic signals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据