4.4 Article

myo-Inositol and D-Ribose Ligand Discrimination in an ABC Periplasmic Binding Protein

期刊

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
卷 195, 期 10, 页码 2379-2388

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.00116-13

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  2. Michigan Technology Tri-Corridor [085P1000817]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The periplasmic binding protein (PBP) IbpA mediates the uptake of myo-inositol by the IatP-IatA ATP-binding cassette transmembrane transporter. We report a crystal structure of Caulobacter crescentus IbpA bound to myo-inositol at 1.45 angstrom resolution. This constitutes the first structure of a PBP bound to inositol. IbpA adopts a type I PBP fold consisting of two alpha-beta lobes that surround a central hinge. A pocket positioned between the lobes contains the myo-inositol ligand, which binds with submicromolar affinity (0.76 +/- 0.08 mu M). IbpA is homologous to ribose-binding proteins and binds D-ribose with low affinity (50.8 +/- 3.4 mu M). On the basis of IbpA and ribose-binding protein structures, we have designed variants of IbpA with inverted binding specificity for myo-inositol and D-ribose. Five mutations in the ligand-binding pocket are sufficient to increase the affinity of IbpA for D-ribose by 10-fold while completely abolishing binding to myo-inositol. Replacement of ibpA with these mutant alleles unable to bind myo-inositol abolishes C. crescentus growth in medium containing myo-inositol as the sole carbon source. Neither deletion of ibpA nor replacement of ibpA with the high-affinity ribose binding allele affected C. crescentus growth on D-ribose as a carbon source, providing evidence that the IatP-IatA transporter is specific for myo-inositol. This study outlines the evolutionary relationship between ribose- and inositol-binding proteins and provides insight into the molecular basis upon which these two related, but functionally distinct, classes of periplasmic proteins specifically bind carbohydrate ligands.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据