4.4 Article

Feed-Forward Regulation of Microbisporicin Biosynthesis in Microbispora corallina

期刊

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
卷 193, 期 12, 页码 3064-3071

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.00250-11

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, United Kingdom
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/J/00000607] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lantibiotics are ribosomally synthesized, posttranslationally modified peptide antibiotics. Microbisporicin is a potent lantibiotic produced by the actinomycete Microbispora corallina and contains unique chlorinated tryptophan and dihydroxyproline residues. The biosynthetic gene cluster for microbisporicin encodes several putative regulatory proteins, including, uniquely, an extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factor, sigma(MibX), a likely cognate anti-sigma factor, MibW, and a potential helix-turn-helix DNA binding protein, MibR. Here we examine the roles of these proteins in regulating microbisporicin biosynthesis. S1 nuclease protection assays were used to determine transcriptional start sites in the microbisporicin gene cluster and confirmed the presence of the likely ECF sigma factor -10 and -35 sequences in five out of six promoters. In contrast, the promoter of mibA, encoding the microbisporicin prepropeptide, has a typical Streptomyces vegetative sigma factor consensus sequence. The ECF sigma factor sigma(MibX) was shown to interact with the putative anti-sigma factor MibW in Escherichia coli using bacterial two-hybrid analysis. sigma(MibX) autoregulates its own expression but does not directly regulate expression of mibA. On the basis of quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) data, we propose a model for the biosynthesis of microbisporicin in which MibR functions as an essential master regulator and the ECF sigma factor/anti-sigma factor pair, sigma(MibX)/MibW, induces feed-forward biosynthesis of microbisporicin and producer immunity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据