4.4 Article

Mutagenesis and Chemical Cross-Linking Suggest that Wzz Dimer Stability and Oligomerization Affect Lipopolysaccharide O-Antigen Modal Chain Length Control

期刊

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
卷 192, 期 13, 页码 3385-3393

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.01134-09

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  2. University of Adelaide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Shigella flexneri, the polysaccharide copolymerase (PCP) protein Wzz(SF) confers a modal length of 10 to 17 repeat units (RUs) to the O-antigen (Oag) component of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). PCPs form oligomeric structures believed to be related to their function. To identify functionally important regions within Wzz(SF), random in-frame linker mutagenesis was used to create mutants with 5-amino-acid insertions (termed Wzz(i) proteins), and DNA sequencing was used to locate the insertions. Analysis of the resulting LPS conferred by Wzz(i) proteins identified five mutant classes. The class I mutants were inactive, resulting in nonregulated LPS Oag chains, while classes II and III conferred shorter LPS Oag chains of 2 to 10 and 8 to 14 RUs, respectively. Class IV mutants retained near-wild-type function, and class V mutants increased the LPS Oag chain length to 16 to 25 RUs. In vivo formaldehyde cross-linking indicated class V mutants readily formed high-molecular-mass oligomers; however, class II and III Wzz(i) mutants were not effectively cross-linked. Wzz dimer stability was also investigated by heating cross-linked oligomers at 100 degrees C in the presence of SDS. Unlike the WzzSF wild type and class IV and V Wzz(i) mutants, the class II and III mutant dimers were not detectable. The location of each insertion was mapped onto available PCP three-dimensional (3D) structures, revealing that class V mutations were most likely located within the inner cavity of the PCP oligomer. These data suggest that the ability to produce stable dimers may be important in determining Oag modal chain length.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据