4.4 Article

NtrC-Dependent Regulatory Network for Nitrogen Assimilation in Pseudomonas putida

期刊

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
卷 191, 期 19, 页码 6123-6135

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.00744-09

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [BIO2005-03094, BIO2008-01805, CSD2007-00005]
  2. Andalusian government [P05-CVI131, P07-CVI-2518]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/J/00000016] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pseudomonas putida KT2440 is a model strain for studying bacterial biodegradation processes. However, very little is known about nitrogen regulation in this strain. Here, we show that the nitrogen regulatory NtrC proteins from P. putida and Escherichia coli are functionally equivalent and that substitutions leading to partially active forms of enterobacterial NtrC provoke the same phenotypes in P. putida NtrC. P. putida has only a single P-II-like protein, encoded by glnK, whose expression is nitrogen regulated. Two contiguous NtrC binding sites located upstream of the sigma(N)-dependent glnK promoter have been identified by footprinting analysis. In vitro experiments with purified proteins demonstrated that glnK transcription was directly activated by NtrC and that open complex formation at this promoter required integration host factor. Transcription of genes orthologous to enterobacterial codB, dppA, and ureD genes, whose transcription is dependent on sigma(70) and which are activated by Nac in E. coli, has also been analyzed for P. putida. Whereas dppA does not appear to be regulated by nitrogen via NtrC, the codB and ureD genes have sigma(N)-dependent promoters and their nitrogen regulation was exerted directly by NtrC, thus avoiding the need for Nac, which is missing in this bacterial species. Based upon these results, we propose a simplified nitrogen regulatory network in P. putida (compared to that in enterobacteria), which involves an indirect-feedback autoregulation of glnK using NtrC as an intermediary.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据