4.4 Article

Cytoplasmic Protein Mobility in Osmotically Stressed Escherichia coli

期刊

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
卷 191, 期 1, 页码 231-237

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.00536-08

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-0452375]
  2. National Institutes of Health [NIH GM 47022]
  3. UW-Madison Molecular Biophysics Training Program [NIH T32 GM08293-19]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM047022, T32GM008293] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Facile diffusion of globular proteins within a cytoplasm that is dense with biopolymers is essential to normal cellular biochemical activity and growth. Remarkably, Escherichia coli grows in minimal medium over a wide range of external osmolalities (0.03 to 1.8 osmol). The mean cytoplasmic biopolymer volume fraction () for such adapted cells ranges from 0.16 at 0.10 osmol to 0.36 at 1.45 osmol. For cells grown at 0.28 osmol, a similar range is obtained by plasmolysis (sudden osmotic upshift) using NaCl or sucrose as the external osmolyte, after which the only available cellular response is passive loss of cytoplasmic water. Here we measure the effective axial diffusion coefficient of green fluorescent protein (D-GFP) in the cytoplasm of E. coli cells as a function of for both plasmolyzed and adapted cells. For plasmolyzed cells, the median D-GFP (D-GFP(m)) decreases by a factor of 70 as increases from 0.16 to 0.33. In sharp contrast, for adapted cells, D-GFP(m) decreases only by a factor of 2.1 as increases from 0.16 to 0.36. Clearly, GFP diffusion is not determined by alone. By comparison with quantitative models, we show that the data cannot be explained by crowding theory. We suggest possible underlying causes of this surprising effect and further experiments that will help choose among competing hypotheses. Recovery of the ability of proteins to diffuse in the cytoplasm after plasmolysis may well be a key determinant of the time scale of the recovery of growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据