4.4 Article

Leucine-Responsive Regulatory Protein (Lrp) Acts as a Virulence Repressor in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium

期刊

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
卷 191, 期 4, 页码 1278-1292

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.01142-08

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [AI24533]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) is a global gene regulator that influences expression of a large number of genes including virulence-related genes in Escherichia coli and Salmonella. No systematic studies examining the regulation of virulence genes by Lrp have been reported in Salmonella. We report here that constitutive expression of Lrp [lrp(Con)] dramatically attenuates Salmonella virulence while an lrp deletion (Delta lrp) mutation enhances virulence. The lrp(Con) mutant caused pleiotropic effects that include defects in invasion, cytotoxicity, and colonization, whereas the Delta lrp mutant was more proficient at these activities than the wild-type strain. We present evidence that Lrp represses transcription of key virulence regulator genes hilA, invF, and ssrA-in Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1) and 2 (SPI-2), by binding directly to their promoter regions, P-hilA, P-invF, and P-ssrA. In addition, Western blot analysis showed that the expression of the SPI-1 effector SipA was reduced in the lrp(Con) mutant and enhanced in the Delta lrp mutant. Computational analysis revealed putative Lrp-binding consensus DNA motifs located in P-hilA, P-invF, and P-ssrA. These results suggest that Lrp binds to the consensus motifs and modulates expression of the linked genes. The presence of leucine enhanced Lrp binding to P-invF in vitro and the addition of leucine to growth medium decreased the level of invF transcription. However, leucine had no effect on expression of hilA and ssrA or on cellular levels of Lrp. In addition, Lrp appears to be an antivirulence gene, since the deletion mutant showed enhanced cell invasion, cytotoxicity, and hypervirulence in BALB/c mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据