4.4 Article

Differential transcriptional analysis of the cyanobacterium Cyanothece sp strain ATCC 51142 during light-dark and continuous-light growth

期刊

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
卷 190, 期 11, 页码 3904-3913

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.00206-08

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analyzed the metabolic rhythms and differential gene expression in the unicellular, diazotrophic cyanobacterium Cyanothece sp. strain ATCC 51142 under N-2-fixing conditions after a shift from normal 12-h light-12-h dark cycles to continuous light. We found that the mRNA levels of similar to 10% of the genes in the genome demonstrated circadian behavior during growth in free-running (continuous light) conditions. The genes for N-2 fixation displayed a strong circadian behavior, whereas photosynthesis and respiration genes were not as tightly regulated. One of our main objectives was to determine the strategies used by these cells to perform N-2 fixation under normal day-night conditions, as well as under the greater stress caused by continuous light. We determined that N-2 fixation cycled in continuous light but with a lower N-2 fixation activity. Glycogen degradation, respiration, and photosynthesis were also lower; nonetheless, O-2 evolution was about 50% of the normal peak. We also demonstrated that nifH (encoding the nitrogenase Fe protein), nijB, and nifX were strongly induced in continuous light; this is consistent with the role of these proteins during the assembly of the enzyme complex and suggested that the decreased N-2 fixation activity was due to protein-level regulation or inhibition. Many soluble electron carriers (e.g., ferredoxins), as well as redox carriers (e.g., thioredoxin and glutathione), were strongly induced during N-2 fixation in continuous light. We suggest that these carriers are required to enhance cyclic electron transport and phosphorylation for energy production and to maintain appropriate redox levels in the presence of elevated O-2, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据