4.7 Review

Mechanisms of environmental influence on human autoimmunity: A national institute of environmental health sciences expert panel workshop

期刊

JOURNAL OF AUTOIMMUNITY
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 272-284

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2012.05.007

关键词

Tolerance breakdown; Adjuvant; Antigen modification; Epigenetics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanisms leading to autoimmune diseases remain largely unknown despite numerous lines of experimental inquiry and epidemiological evidence. The growing number of genome-wide association studies and the largely incomplete concordance for autoimmune diseases in monozygotic twins support the role of the environment (including infectious agents and chemicals) in the breakdown of tolerance leading to autoimmunity via numerous mechanisms. The present article reviews the major theories on the mechanisms of the environmental influence on autoimmunity by addressing the different degrees of confidence that characterize our knowledge. The theories discussed herein include (i) the role of innate immunity mediated by toll-like receptors in triggering the autoimmune adaptive response characterizing the observed pathology; (ii) changes in spleen marginal zone B cells in autoantibody production with particular focus on the B10 subpopulation; (iii) Th17 cell differentiation and T regulatory cells in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor model; (iv) self antigen changes induced by chemical and infectious agents which could break tolerance by post-translational modifications and molecular mimicry; and finally (v) epigenetic changes, particularly DNA methylation, that are induced by environmental stimuli and may contribute to autoimmunity initiation. We are convinced that these working hypotheses, in most cases supported by solid evidence, should be viewed in parallel with animal models and epidemiological observations to provide a comprehensive picture of the environmental causes of autoimmune diseases. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据