4.7 Article

AIRE deficiency leads to impaired iNKT cell development

期刊

JOURNAL OF AUTOIMMUNITY
卷 34, 期 1, 页码 66-72

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2009.07.002

关键词

Autoimmunity; Tolerance; Autoimmune polyendocrine; syndrome type I; Autoimmune regulator gene; iNKT cells; NK cells

资金

  1. Swedish Medical Council
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. Lundberg foundation
  4. Ronald McDonald foundation
  5. Gronwalls foundation
  6. Magnus Bergvall foundation
  7. Sven Jerring Foundation
  8. Swedish Diabetes Association
  9. Swedish Medical Society
  10. Agnes and Mac Rudbergs foundation
  11. Swedish Cancer Society
  12. Wenner-Gren Foundations
  13. Karolinska Institutet

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autoimmune Polyendocrine Syndrome type I (APS I) is caused by mutations in the Autoimmune Regulator gene (AIRE), and results in the immunological destruction of endocrine organs. Herein we have characterized the CD1d-restricted invariant NKT cells (iNKT) and NK cells in APS I patients and Aire(-/-) mice, two cell populations known to play a role in the regulation of autoimmune disease. We show that the frequency of circulating iNKT cells is reduced in APS I patients compared to healthy controls. In accordance with this, iNKT cells are significantly reduced in the thymus and peripheral organs of Aire(-/-) mice. Bone marrow transfer from wild type donors into lethally irradiated Aire(-/-) recipients led to a decreased iNKT cell population in the liver, suggesting an impaired development of iNKT cells in the absence of Aire expression in radio-resistant cells. In contrast to the iNKT cells, both conventional NK cells and thymus-derived NK cells were unaffected by Aire deficiency and differentiated normally in Aire(-/-) mice. Our results show that expression of Aire in radio-resistant cells is important for the development of iNKT cells, whereas NK cell development and function does not depend on Aire. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据