4.2 Article

Validation and revision of far-field-current relationship for the lightning strike to electrically short objects

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2014.08.015

关键词

Tall object; Lightning stroke current; Underestimation and overestimation; Risetime of current

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2014CB441405]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41275009, 41375037]
  3. Commonwealth Industry Research Project of China [GYHY201306069]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper we have validated and revised the general expressions for far-field-current factors presented by Bermudez et al. (2005, 2007) for lightning strike to tall objects on perfectly and finitely conducting ground, respectively. For the perfectly conducting ground, it is found that when the risetime of lightning return stroke current (RT) is larger than 5h/c (h is the height of tall object and c is the light speed), the overestimation caused by the traditional method predicting the lightning current peak is within 10% beyond a distance of 20 km from the lightning channel, and with the decrease of observed horizontal distance d, the error will increase due to the effect of induction field component. For example, when d is 10 km, the overestimation is about 20% for strike to a 300-m-tall object. For the finite conductivity ranging from 0.01 S/m to 0.001 S/m, when the lightning strikes the 300-m-tall object, the lightning current peak predicted from the measured magnetic field peak according to the traditional method is overestimated ranging from about +5% to +20% (positive means overestimation while negative means underestimation) and the derivation value is more within a distance of 20 km because of induction field component; When the lightning strikes the 50-m-tall object, the predicted current peak according to the traditional method has an error ranging from about +5% to -15%. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据