4.2 Article

Horizontal extension of acoustic resonance between the ground and the lower thermosphere

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2011.12.003

关键词

Acoustic wave; Gravity wave; Evanescent wave; Thermal duct; Acoustic resonance; Mesosphere; Lower thermosphere; Stratosphere

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [10J00356] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A time-dependent, two-dimensional, nonlinear, non-hydrostatic, compressible, numerical model is used to investigate the horizontal extension of acoustic waves trapped in a thermal duct between the lower thermosphere and the ground or the stratosphere, and evanescent and gravity waves around them. The simulation shows that an impulsive point source on the ground excites acoustic waves ducted in the mesosphere. The ducted acoustic waves have horizontal wavelengths longer than 130 km and frequencies of 3.7-3.8 mHz. This ducted acoustic waves are identified as acoustic resonance modes expected in previous studies. They extend to 300 km distance from the source after 2 h. In the case of the source with a finite width, the acoustic resonance would extend to 300 km out of the edge of the source. The temporal variation of two resonance modes is also declared. In the vicinity of the source, two acoustic resonance modes are formed which have frequencies of 3.7 and 4.4 mHz. The mode of 4.4 mHz is dominant above the mesopause for about 50 min after the impulsive perturbation of the source since the mode is leaky. On the other hand, the mode of 3.7 mHz is well trapped in the thermal duct and persist over 2 h. In addition to the acoustic waves, evanescent gravity waves with horizontal wavelengths shorter than 100 km and with frequencies between 2.4 and 3.6 mHz are excited in the stratosphere. Gravity waves freely propagating are also excited with frequencies lower than 2 mHz and with horizontal wavelengths shorter than 130 km. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据