4.3 Article

An Objective Algorithm for Detecting and Tracking Tropical Cloud Clusters: Implications for Tropical Cyclogenesis Prediction

期刊

JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY
卷 28, 期 8, 页码 1007-1018

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/2010JTECHA1522.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. NOAA Climate Change Data and Detection (CCDD) [OAR-CPO-2009-2001430]
  2. UNC Asheville Undergraduate Research Program Advisory Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An algorithm to detect and track global tropical cloud clusters (TCCs) is presented. TCCs are organized large areas of convection that form over warm tropical waters. TCCs are important because they are the seedlings'' that can evolve into tropical cyclones. A TCC satisfies the necessary condition of a preexisting disturbance,'' which provides the required latent heat release to drive the development of tropical cyclone circulations. The operational prediction of tropical cyclogenesis is poor because of weaknesses in the observational network and numerical models; thus, past studies have focused on identifying differences between developing'' (evolving into a tropical cyclone) and nondeveloping'' (failing to do so) TCCs in the global analysis fields to produce statistical forecasts of these events. The algorithm presented here has been used to create a global dataset of all TCCs that formed from 1980 to 2008. Capitalizing on a global, Gridded Satellite (GridSat) infrared (IR) dataset, areas of persistent, intense convection are identified by analyzing characteristics of the IR brightness temperature (T(b)) fields. Identified TCCs are tracked as they move around their ocean basin (or cross into others); variables such as TCC size, location, convective intensity, cloud-top height, development status (i.e., developing or nondeveloping), and a movement vector are recorded in Network Common Data Form (NetCDF). The algorithm can be adapted to near-real-time tracking of TCCs, which could be of great benefit to the tropical cyclone forecast community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据