4.3 Article

Extreme Heat Considerations in International Football Venues: The Utility of Climatologic Data in Decision Making

期刊

JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING
卷 53, 期 9, 页码 860-865

出版社

NATL ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-361-17

关键词

wet bulb globe temperature; safety policies; soccer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Exposure to severe heat can have detrimental effects on athletic performance and increase the risk of exertional heat injuries. Therefore, proactive assessment of the environmental characteristics of international football match venues becomes critical in ensuring the safety and optimal performance of the athletes. Objective: To propose the use of climatologic data (modeled wet-bulb globe temperature [WBGT]) in making athletic-event management decisions for the 2020 Summer Olympic Games and the 2022 Federation Internationale de Football Association World Cup. Design: Descriptive study. Setting: Hourly meteorologic input data for a WBGT model were obtained from the second Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications for Japan (Yokohama and Saitama) and Qatar (Doha and Al-Daayen). Main Outcome Measure(s): The pattern of hourly WBGT and percentage of hours between 30 degrees C and 32 degrees C and exceeding 32 degrees C WBGT during the expected competition periods for the 2020 Summer Olympic Games in Japan and the scheduled (November, December) and traditional (June, July) periods of the World Cup games in Qatar. Results: The WBGT during the 2020 Olympic football tournament in Japan may exceed 30 degrees C in 40% to 50% of the late mornings and early afternoons. The shift in tournament timing for the 2022 Federation Internationale de Football Association World Cup in Qatar from the summer to late fall will reduce the exposure to >30 degrees C WBGT to null. Conclusions: Directors of mass sporting events should consider using climatologic data in their organizational decision making to assess the potential heat illness risk and to implement risk-mitigation plans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据