4.4 Article

Effects of Eicosapentaenoic Acid on the Levels of Inflammatory Markers, Cardiac Function and Long-Term Prognosis in Chronic Heart Failure Patients with Dyslipidemia

期刊

JOURNAL OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS
卷 21, 期 7, 页码 712-729

出版社

JAPAN ATHEROSCLEROSIS SOC
DOI: 10.5551/jat.21022

关键词

Eicosapentaenoic acid; Cytokine; Heart failure; Dyslipidemia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: The effects of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) on the levels of inflammatory markers, cardiac function and long-term prognosis in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with dyslipidemia remain unclear. Methods: A total of 139 CHF patients with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 37.6 +/- 8.0% were divided into two groups based on whether EPA was included in their treatment regimen: the EPA group (n = 71) and the no EPA group (n = 68). Only patients with dyslipidemia at baseline (entry) were treated with EPA. The monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) levels were measured at baseline and after 12 months of treatment. Results: At 12 months, in the EPA group, the LVEF had improved and the MCP-1 and ADMA levels had decreased (respectively, p<0.001); however, in the no EPA group, the LVEF had worsened, while the MCP-1 and ADMA levels had increased (respectively, p<0.001). Fifty-five patients experienced cardiac events, including 15 cardiac deaths and 40 readmissions for worsening of CHF during a median follow-up period of 28.0 months. The percent change in LVEF from baseline was found to be significantly associated with the percent change in ADMA (r = -0.462, p<0.001). A multivariate Cox hazard analysis showed EPA treatment (hazard ratio: 0.21, 95% confidence interval: 0.05-0.93, p=0.031) to be an independent predictor of cardiac events. Conclusions: These data indicate that EPA treatment may improve the cardiac function and long-term prognosis of CHF patients with dyslipidemia, at least in part, due to reductions in inflammation and improvements in the endothelial function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据