4.4 Article

Euterpe Oleracea (Acai) Modifies Sterol Metabolism and Attenuates Experimentally-Induced Atherosclerosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 237-245

出版社

JAPAN ATHEROSCLEROSIS SOC
DOI: 10.5551/jat.11205

关键词

Euterpe oleracea (acai); Atherosclerosis; Lipids; Desmosterol; Phytosterols

资金

  1. National Council of Science and Technology (CNPq) [2008/57685-7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Euterpe oleracea (acai) is a fruit from the Amazon region whose chemical composition may be beneficial for individuals with atherosclerosis. We hypothesized that consumption of Euterpe oleracea would reduce atherosclerosis development by decreasing cholesterol absorption and synthesis. Methods: Male New Zealand rabbits were fed a cholesterol-enriched diet (0.5%) for 12 weeks, when they were randomized to receive Euterpe oleracea extract (n=15) or water (n=12) plus a 0.05% cholesterol-enriched diet for an additional 12 weeks. Plasma phytosterols and desmosterol were determined by ultra-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Atherosclerotic lesions were estimated by computerized planimetry and histomorphometry. Results: At sacrifice, animals treated with Euterpe oleracea had lower levels of total cholesterol (p=0.03), non-HDL-cholesterol (p=0.03) and triglycerides (p=0.02) than controls. These animals had smaller atherosclerotic plaque area in their aortas (p=0.001) and a smaller intima/media ratio (p=0.002) than controls, without differences in plaque composition. At the end of the study, campesterol, beta-sitosterol, and desmosterol plasma levels did not differ between groups; however, animals treated with Euterpe oleracea showed lower desmosterol/campesterol (p=0.026) and desmosterol/beta-sitosterol (p=0.006) ratios than controls. Conclusions: Consumption of Euterpe oleracea extract markedly improved the lipid profile and attenuated atherosclerosis. These effects were related in part to a better balance in the synthesis and absorption of sterols.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据