4.4 Article

Small Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Concentration is a Determinant of Endothelial Dysfunction by Peripheral Artery Tonometry in Men

期刊

JOURNAL OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS
卷 19, 期 10, 页码 897-903

出版社

JAPAN ATHEROSCLEROSIS SOC
DOI: 10.5551/jat.13243

关键词

Endothelial dysfunction; Peripheral artery tonometry; Reactive hyperemia; Small LDL cholesterol; High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

资金

  1. Japan Society of Health Evaluation and Promotion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Endothelial dysfunction is an initial step in the progression of atherosclerosis. Precise measurements of lipoprotein subclass distribution by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) have been established. Here, we investigated the potential associations between lipoprotein subclass cholesterol concentrations and endothelial dysfunction evaluated by digital reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT). Methods: We recruited 120 apparently healthy Japanese men. Endothelial function was assessed by digital reactive hyperemia PAT, expressed as the logarithmic-scaled reactive hyperemia index (RHI). Plasma cholesterol concentrations in lipoproteins and their subclasses were determined by HPLC with gel permeation columns. Results: RHI was inversely correlated with age (r = -0.258, p = 0.004), followed by LDL cholesterol (r = -0.236, p = 0.010) and small LDL cholesterol (r = -0.223, p = 0.014). In addition, RHI was significantly inversely associated with heart rate, hemoglobin A1c, total cholesterol, medium LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B100, and non-HDL cholesterol. In stepwise multiple regression analysis, age (beta = -0.266, p = 0.024), small LDL cholesterol (beta = -0.213, p = 0.015), and heart rate (beta = -0.183, p = 0.036) were found to be independent determinants of RHI (adjusted R-2 = 0.132, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Small LDL cholesterol concentration was an important, independent determinant of endothelial dysfunction in men.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据