4.2 Article

Oral hygiene and dental status as factors related to asthma in high school and college students

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASTHMA
卷 52, 期 4, 页码 376-381

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/02770903.2014.974816

关键词

Caries; dental care; DMF index; oral microbiota; oral rinse; toothpaste

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Considering that oral microbiota might modulate immune responses, we explored if customary oral care procedures might influence immune-driven diseases such as asthma. Methods: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of responses to a self-completion medical questionnaire applied to subjects entering into college and high school programs during 2006-2011. Results: Responses from 329 780 students aged 14-24 years (97.6% of the original population) were analyzed. The prevalence of lifetime asthma was 4.01%. Subjects with asthma were slightly older, taller and heavier than subjects without asthma, and these differences were equally present in males and females. Subjects currently having two or more decayed teeth had asthma less frequently than those with one or none decayed tooth, with an odds ratio (OR) = 0.86 and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.83-0.89. In contrast, asthma was reported more frequently among students having two or more missing or filled teeth [OR = 1.1 (95% CI 1.04-1.17) and OR = 1.05 (95% CI 1.01-1.09), respectively]. From 2008 onwards, subjects also responded questions about oral hygiene incorporated into the core questionnaire. In these subjects, the use of toothpaste as well as the frequency and duration of toothbrushing were unrelated to asthma; regular use of mouthwash was associated with asthma in women [OR = 1.16 (95% CI 1.07-1.25)], but not in men [OR = 1.04 (95% CI 0.96-1.13)]. Results of multiple logistic regressions were in line with these findings. Conclusions: Our results suggested that oral hygiene and dental status could be novel factors influencing asthma development, and thus further studies to confirm and clarify this association are warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据