4.2 Article

The Relationship of Asthma-Specific Quality of Life During Pregnancy to Subsequent Asthma and Perinatal Morbidity

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASTHMA
卷 47, 期 1, 页码 46-50

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/02770900903483758

关键词

asthma; exacerbations; perinatal outcomes; pulmonary function; quality of life

资金

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [HD27917, HD27915, HD21414, HD27883, HD27869, HD27861, HD27905, HD34122, HD21410, HD34116, HD34136, HD27860, HD34210, HD34208, HD36801]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To determine whether asthma-specific quality of life during pregnancy is related to asthma exacerbations and to perinatal outcomes. Methods. This was a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of inhaled beclomethasone versus theophylline in the treatment of moderate asthma during pregnancy. The Juniper Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) was administered to patients at enrollment. Exacerbations were defined as asthma symptoms requiring a hospitalization, unscheduled medical visit, or oral corticosteroid course. Results. Quality of life assessments were provided by 3 10 of the 385 participants who completed the study. There was more than a 25% decrease in the odds of a subsequent asthma exacerbation for every 1-point increase in AQLQ score for the overall score (odds ratio [OR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.96), emotion domain (OR 0.72. 95% Cl 0.59-0.88). and symptoms domain (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57-0.94). These relationships were not significantly influenced by initial symptom frequency or forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)). No significant relationships were demonstrated between enrollment AQLQ scores and preeclampsia. preterm birth, low birth weight. or small for gestational age. Conclusion. Asthma-specific quality of life in early pregnancy is related to subsequent asthma morbidity during pregnancy but not to perinatal outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据