4.4 Article

Depression of HspA2 in human testis is associated with spermatogenic impairment and fertilization rate in ICSI treatment for azoospermic individuals

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS
卷 31, 期 12, 页码 1687-1693

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-014-0360-7

关键词

Spermatogenesis; Heat shock protein A2; Immunohistochemistry; Fertilization rate; ICSI

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [30901493]
  2. National Key Technology Support Program [2012BAI32B04]
  3. Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [200803351041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Heat shock protein A2 (HspA2) expression was quantitatively measured in human testis and its relationship with the spermatogenetic status and laboratory outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was investigated. Methods Testicular tissues of azoospermia men were divided into four groups according to histopahtology: normal spermatogenesiss, hypospermatogenesis, maturation arrest and Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS). HspA2 immunostaining was measured by Image Pro-Plus (IPP) and laboratory outcomes were calculated. The regression analysis between HspA2 expression and Johnsen score of as well as fertilization, cleavage and high quality embryo rate was performed. Results HspA2 was strongly present in the cytoplasm of spermatocytes and spermatides in normal testis. However, hypospermatogenesis and maturation arrest testicular tissues demonstrated light staining and no staining for SCOS. Quantitative image analysis showed that there were significant differences among groups (P=0.000 & P=0.001). HspA2 exspression was founded significantly correlated spermatogenetic status (R-2=0.726, P=0.000) as well as fertilization rate in ICSI (R-2=0.569, P=0.000). Conclusions The fertilization rate with ICSI is associated with HspA2 expression in the testis from which sperm retrieved and the alteration of HspA2 expression has been involved in spermatogenic impairment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据