4.4 Article

Antioxidant supplementation of culture medium during embryo development and/or after vitrification-warming; which is the most important?

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-009-9317-7

关键词

beta-mercaptoethanol (beta ME); Bovine embryo; Developmental competence; Cryosurvival

资金

  1. Royan Institute of I.R.I.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To determine the most optimal stage for antioxidant supplementation of culture medium to improve developmental competence, cryotolerance and DNA-fragmentation of bovine embryos. Presumptive zygotes were first cultured in presence or absence of beta-mercaptoethanol (beta-ME), for 8 days. Subsequently, half of the expanded blastocysts developed in both groups were vitrified, warmed within 30 min and post-warming embryos along with their corresponding non-vitrified embryos were cultured for two further days in presence or absence of (100 A mu M) beta ME. For vitrified and non-vitrified embryos, the best effect was found when beta ME was added from day 1 of in vitro culture in continuation with post-warming culture period. Day 1-8 supplementation significantly increased the rates of cleavage, day 7 and day 8 blastocyst production. For non-vitrified embryos, beta ME addition during day 1-8 and/or 9-10 of embryo culture improved both hatching rate and quality of hatched embryos. For vitrified embryos, however, the percentage of DNA-fragmentation (18.5%) was significantly higher (p a parts per thousand currency signaEuro parts per thousand 0.05) than that of embryos developed in absence of beta ME but supplemented with beta ME during post-warming period (13.5%). Exogenous antioxidant increases the chance of embryos, even those of fair-quality, to develop to blastocyst. However, antioxidant inclusion during in vitro embryo development is not sufficient to maintain the redox state of these embryos during the critical period of post-warming embryo culture, and therefore, there should be a surplus source of exogenous antioxidant during post-warming embryo culture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据