4.6 Article

Zircon geochronology and Hf isotopes of Mesozoic intrusive rocks from the Yidun terrane, Eastern Tibetan Plateau: Petrogenesis and their bearings with Cu mineralization

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASIAN EARTH SCIENCES
卷 80, 期 -, 页码 18-33

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.10.028

关键词

Zircon U-Pb geochronology; Hf isotope; Mesozoic intrusive rocks; Cu-polymetallic mineralization; Orogenic collapse; Yidun terrane

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [40972046, 41190070, 41172095, 41272126]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [GIGCX-08-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zircon U-Pb ages and Hf isotopic composition of Mesozoic intrusive rocks from the Yidun terrane were systematically investigated in order to decipher the geodynamic setting of magmatism and their relationship with Cu-polymetallic mineralization in the Eastern Tibetan Plateau. Zircon U-Pb dating results on seven granitoid rocks and four diorite samples indicate that the Mesozoic plutons from the Yidun terrane were emplaced in the period of 224-214 Ma with a peak at similar to 216 Ma. Zircon Hf isotopic compositions show that these intrusive rocks were derived from different source regions. The dioritic porphyries with the formation ages of similar to 216 Ma in the Zhongdian area of the southern Yidun terrane, together with the granodiorite of similar to 216 Ma from the Maxionggou batholith, originated from the remelting of the late Mesoproterozoic (similar to 1.2 Ga) juvenile continental lower crust, whereas most granitic rocks were derived from the reworking of the early Mesoproterozoic (similar to 1.6 to 1.5 Ga) middle-lower crust. Our results, together with previous data, indicate that the collision between the Yidun and Songpan-Ganzi terranes and subsequent orogeny had been completed by the middle Triassic. A post-orogenic collapse model is proposed for the Meosozoic magmatism and related Cu-polymetallic mineralization in the Yidun terrane. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据