4.6 Article

Magmatic-hydrothermal evolution of the Cretaceous Duolong gold-rich porphyry copper deposit in the Bangongco metallogenic belt, Tibet: Evidence from U-Pb and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASIAN EARTH SCIENCES
卷 41, 期 6, 页码 525-536

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2011.03.008

关键词

Gold-rich porphyry copper deposit; Zircon U-Pb geochronology; 40Ar/39Ar geochronology; Duo long; Bangongco metallogenic belt; Tibet

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation [40902027, 40672068, 40772066]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20090450567]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Duolong gold-rich porphyry copper deposit was recently discovered and represents a giant prospect (inferred resources of 4-5 Mt fine-Cu with a grade of 0.72% Cu; 30-50 t fine-gold with a grade of 0.23 g/t Au) in the Bangongco metallogenic belt, Tibet. Zircon SHRIMP and LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology shows that the multiple porphyritic intrusions were emplaced during two episodes, the first at about 121 Ma (Bolong mineralized granodiorite porphyry (BMGP) and barren granodiorite porphyry (BGP)) and the second about 116 Ma (Duobuza mineralized granodiorite porphyry (DMGP)). Moreover, the basaltic andesites also have two episodes at about 118 Ma and 106 Ma, respectively. One andesite yields an U-Pb zircon age of 111.9 +/- 1.9 Ma, indicating it formed after the multiple granodiorite porphyries. By contrast, the 40Ar/39Ar age of 115.2 +/- 1.1 Ma (hydrothermal K-feldspar vein hosted in DMGP) reveals the close temporal relationship of ore-bearing potassic alteration to the emplacement of the DMGP. The sericite from quartz-sericite vein (hosted in DMGP) yields a 40Ar/39Ar age of 115.2 +/- 1.2 Ma. Therefore, the ore-forming magmatic-hydrothermal evolution probably persisted for 6 my. Additionally, the zircon U-Pb ages (106121 Ma) of the volcanic rocks and the porphyries suggest that the Neo-Tethys Ocean was still subducting northward during the Early Cretaceous. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据