4.2 Article

Behavior and molecular physiology of nurses of worker and queen larvae in honey bees (Apis mellifera)

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASIA-PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGY
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 911-916

出版社

KOREAN SOC APPLIED ENTOMOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.aspen.2014.10.006

关键词

Honey bee; Behavioral specialisation; DGE; Hypopharyngeal gland; Nursing activity

资金

  1. earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System [CARS-45-KXJ12]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31260524]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a honey bee colony, worker bees rear a new queen by providing her with a larger cell in which to develop and a large amount of richer food (royal jelly). Royal jelly and worker jelly (fed to developing worker larvae) differ in terms of sugar, vitamin, protein and nucleotide composition. Here we examined whether workers attending queen and worker larvae are separate specialized sub-castes of the nurse bees. We collected nurse bees attending queen larvae (AQL) and worker larvae (AWL) and compared gene expression profiles of hypopharyngeal gland tissues, using Solexa/Illumina digital gene expression tag profiling (DGE). Significant differences in gene expression were found that included a disproportionate number of genes involved in glandular secretion and royal jelly synthesis. However behavioral observations showed that these were not two entirely distinct populations. Nurse workers were observed attending both worker larvae and queen larvae, and there was no evidence of a specialized group of workers that preferentially or exclusively attended developing queens. Nevertheless, AQL attended larvae more frequently compared to AWL, suggesting that nurses sampled attending queen larvae may have been the most active nurses. This study serves as another example of the relationship between differences in gene expression and behavioral specialisation in honey bees. (C) 2014 Korean Society of Applied Entomology, Taiwan Entomological Society and Malaysian Plant Protection Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据