4.2 Article

Synergistic effects of essential oil-based cream formulations against Culex quinquefasciatus Say and Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae)

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASIA-PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGY
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 327-331

出版社

KOREAN SOC APPLIED ENTOMOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.aspen.2014.02.008

关键词

Essential oil formulation; Cream-based mosquito repellent; Culex quinquefasciatus; Aedes aegypti

资金

  1. Entomology Research Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mosquitoes are major arthropod vectors responsible for several pathogenic diseases. In recent years, repellents of botanical origin, particularly essential oils, have been used against mosquitoes and have been found effective and safe. In this study, five different repellent cream formulations (CF1-5) were prepared using combinations of essential oils, including camphor, cinnamon, citronella, lemongrass, lime, orange, neem, basil, Vitex, Lantana, eucalyptus, and clove, and their repellency was tested using Culex quinquefasciatus Say and Aedes aegypti L. under laboratory conditions and compared to the standard synthetic repellent N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET-12%, w/w). Among the five cream formulations, CF2 at a dose of 5 mg/cm(2) showed the longest protection time of 4.18 h and 3.31 h against C quinquefasciatus and A. aegypti, respectively, under laboratory conditions. CF3 at a dose of 5 mg/cm(2) was moderately effective, with protection times of 3.42 h and 2.58 h against C. quinquefasciatus and A. aegypti, respectively, under laboratory conditions. CF2 at a dose of 5 mg/cm(2) was also tested in the field against wild mosquitoes for 3 h, and 100% protection was observed for the entire study period. Thus, CF2 could be used in developing an effective natural repellent as an alternative to the existing synthetic repellents to C quinquefasciatus and A. aegypti. (C) 2014 Korean Society of Applied Entomology, Taiwan Entomological Society and Malaysian Plant Protection Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据