4.0 Article

Gelatin hydrogel impregnated with platelet-rich plasma releasate promotes angiogenesis and wound healing in murine model

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 64-71

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10047-014-0795-8

关键词

Platelet-rich plasma; Biomaterial; Gelatin hydrogel; Growth factors; Wound healing

资金

  1. Kansai Medical University
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24390399] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) contains numerous growth factors to promote wound healing and angiogenesis. The objective of this study was to explore the efficacy of biodegradable gelatin hydrogel impregnated with PRP releasate (PRPr) in the wound healing process compared with the single application of PRPr prepared from mouse PRP centrifuged by a double-spin method. Gelatin hydrogel disks with an isoelectric point of 5.0 were used in this study. A total of 180 mice (n = 45/group) were randomly assigned to the following 4 experimental groups: control group, biodegradable gelatin hydrogel group, PRPr group and gelatin hydrogel impregnated with PRPr (PRPrG) group. Wound area and epithelialization were compared on days 1, 5, 7, 14 and 21 post-wounding. After complete epithelialization, wound contraction was also evaluated. Neovascularization using immunohistochemical staining of von Willebrand factor was analyzed on day 14. The wound area of PRPrG on days 5, 7 and 14 was smaller than that in the other groups (p < 0.01). The epithelialization lengths of PRPrG on days 7 and 14 were significantly longer than the others (p < 0.01). The capillary formation of PRPrG was also superior to those in all other groups on day 14. On day 21, all wounds were completely epithelialized and PRPrG prevented wound contraction the most. It is concluded that the sustained-release system of gelatin impregnated with PRPr can stimulate angiogenesis and accelerate wound healing compared with the single application of PRP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据