4.5 Article

Annual movements of Mongolian gazelles: Nomads in the Eastern Steppe

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS
卷 74, 期 11, 页码 1435-1442

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.05.022

关键词

Grassland; Grazing ecosystem; Large ungulate movements; Nomadism; Procapra gutturosa

资金

  1. UNDP/GEF/Government of Mongolia
  2. Wildlife Conservation Society
  3. National University of Mongolia
  4. Disney Conservation Fund
  5. Smithsonian Institution
  6. National Science Foundation [DEB-0743385, DEB0743557]
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences
  8. Division Of Environmental Biology [0743385] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Determining the scale and pattern of, and the influences on, the movements of Mongolian gazelles is important because their numbers and range have been reduced significantly, and their remaining grassland habitat faces further fragmentation and degradation. Therefore, during 2000-2005 we monitored movements of individually marked Mongolian gazelle calves and adult females in the Eastern Steppe of Mongolia to identify variation in seasonal range sizes and locations, group sizes, and range characteristics. Annual range size for calves varied over an order of magnitude (800-18 700 km(2)), and none of 9 calves tracked for a full year returned to their birth site. Adult gazelles ranged widely (14 000-32 000 km(2) annually) and individuals captured together showed little range overlap. Seasonal shifts in range use suggested gazelles are readily able to take advantage of changing conditions, but the lack of consistent use of seasonal ranges is characteristic of a nomadic movement strategy. Developing strategies that protect ungulate populations that demonstrate nomadic movements is an important consideration in future conservation decisions. Understanding the ecology driving these movements will be an important next step. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据