4.5 Article

Stable isotope analysis of dog, fox, and human diets at a Late Holocene Chumash village (CA-SRI-2) on Santa Rosa Island, California

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE
卷 38, 期 6, 页码 1385-1393

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.02.008

关键词

Stable isotopes; Paleodiet; Canis familiaris; Urocyon littoralis; Island ecology

资金

  1. Smithsonian Institution, University of Oregon
  2. Channel Islands National Park [1443CA8120-00-007]
  3. Ann Huston and Kelly Minas of Channel Islands National Park

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stable carbon (delta C-13) and nitrogen (delta N-15) isotope analyses of dog (Canis familiaris), island fox (Urocyon littoralis), and human bone collagen from CA-SRI-2 (AD 130-1830) on Santa Rosa Island, California provide a proxy of diet and the relationships between humans and these animals. Carbon isotopic signatures indicate that Native Americans and their dogs at CA-SRI-2 subsisted almost exclusively on marine resources, while the island fox ate primarily terrestrial foods. Nitrogen isotopes and archaeofaunal remains indicate that humans and dogs also ate higher trophic level foods, including finfishes, marine mammals, and seabirds with smaller amounts of shellfish. The CA-SRI-2 island foxes appear to have eaten higher amounts of terrestrial foods, similar to the diets observed in modern fox populations. These data generally confirm the commensal relationship assumed to exist between domesticated dogs and people, but the carbon isotopic composition of dogs is enriched similar to 2 parts per thousand compared to humans. We hypothesize that the difference in carbon isotopes between dogs and humans may have resulted from a higher consumption of C3 plants with lower delta C-13 values by humans, or less likely from the ingestion by dogs of significant amounts of bone collagen, which is enriched by similar to 4 parts per thousand over associated muscle. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据