4.5 Article

Effects of site lithology on geochemical signatures of human occupation in archaeological house plans in the Netherlands

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 1215-1228

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2009.01.010

关键词

Soil chemistry; Archaeology; Lithology; House plans

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents the application of multi-element soil analyses (X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy of 1 M HCl extracts) to grid samples from 3 archaeological house plans embedded in sandy clays, clays and sands to assess effects of site lithology on geochemical signatures of human occupation. The results indicate that this effect is significant and that each house plan is characterized by enhanced concentrations of different sets of elements. Copper, Cr, Sn and Nd enrichments were found at all sites and thus represent elements that have no or only a weak relation with lithology. Depletions of Fe and Mn were also found to be universal indicators of human occupation in the house plans. A combination of off-site sampling, comparison to regional element background concentrations and the use of bivariate plots (Al vs selected elements) was successfully applied to identify anthropogenic elements, verify background element concentrations and element sources, and assess element distribution patterns within house plans. Spatial patterning of several anthropogenic elements suggest the presence of an in-house barn at two sites, while for another site no spatial patterning of chemical elements was observed. For two sites this contrasts with earlier archaeological interpretation. Our results further suggest that 1 M HCl extractable elements are unreliable indicators of human occupation in clayey and especially calcareous clayey soils. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据