4.5 Article

The sinking of the Mary Rose warship: a medieval mystery solved?

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 166-173

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2008.08.006

关键词

Stable light isotopes; Human; Bone; Enamel; Fatality; Medieval; Shipwreck

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF), South Africa
  2. Wellcome Trust, UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cause of the sinking of Henry VIII's Vice Flagship, the Mary Rose, as she sailed out to meet the French fleet on 19th July AD 1545, has remained an enduring mystery and contested encounter between the English and French Navies. The French claim was that the ship was holed by French cannon fire, whilst the English maintained that she sank due to a poorly executed navigational manoeuvre during the engagement. On the day of the sinking there was a total listed crew complement of 415 men onboard. Minimum number analysis of the commingled human assemblage identified only 179, from which we sampled 18 individuals from differing decks within the ship. We measured delta C-13 and delta N-15 in bone collagen, and delta O-18 and delta C-13 in enamel apatite of these individuals in order to obtain information about their diets and origins. While the collagen delta C-13 and delta N-15 data are similar to other medieval populations, the delta O-18 data indicate that at significant proportion of the crew did not originate in Britain, but rather they emanated from warmer, more southerly, regions. These data suggest the presence of 33-60% of non-natives, possibly mercenaries and/or 'prest' men, amongst the crew. Together with the contemporary remark shouted from the Mary Rose to a passing ship, that the Captain had the type of knaves of whom, he could not rule, our results lend weight to the suggestion that poor communication may well have contributed the observed fatal navigational manoeuvre which led to her sinking. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据